Changing Needs Archived log name to a Less confrontational name

So is changing the Needs Archived log name to a Less confrontational name, a good idea?

Personally I'd say yes, but I would having to deal with the angst generated. And not just cache owners, see Needs Archiving as being very confrontational. Because many times a cache does not get Archived, after a Reviewer steps in and posts a Reviewer log. Which acts as a kick up the backside.

But at the end of the day, people need to express their own opinions. Which they have a opportunity to do in the Groundspeak Get Satisfaction Feedback topic, started by our own Mrs B